Home  /  PERSEUS System

The PERSEUS system

A platform-agnostic reasoning layer that sits between a host UGV’s sensors and its mission, perceiving the environment, applying doctrine, and advising the next tactical action with full traceability.

The principle

Advise, don’t drive.

PERSEUS is not a self-driving stack and not a sensor product. It is the trusted reasoning that sits on top of whatever platform you already operate, taking that platform’s feeds, interpreting the tactical situation, and recommending action a human and the host control stack remain free to accept or reject.

Because the reasoning is separated from both perception and actuation, each layer can be inspected and validated on its own terms. That separation is what makes the system auditable, and what makes it credible to an evaluator.

Operational deployment model
HOST UGV PLATFORM Cameras · EO/IR · LiDAR · radar · odometry GNSS/INS · comms · vehicle health HOST / JAUS ADAPTER · v1 input contracts PERSEUS · EYES sensor-neutral environment + trust model PERSEUS · BRAIN doctrine reasoning → advisory guidance Advisory guidance · COP · audit evidence Host execution stack, owns motion, e-stop, safety
Architecture

Eyes, Brain, Body, and the boundaries between them.

Three subsystems, strictly separated by enforced rules. The boundaries are checked at every commit by an automated guardrail, perception cannot recommend movement, reasoning cannot emit actuator commands, and sensor SDK types never leak past the adapter.

01 · Perception
EYES

Eyes ingest the host platform’s raw feeds and produce descriptive truth only, what the world looks like, never what to do about it.

  • Ingest, synchronisation & deterministic record / replay
  • Environment, terrain, occupancy & occlusion modelling
  • Exposure and blind-sector analysis
  • Per-input trust, freshness & uncertainty
02 · Reasoning
BRAIN

Brain consumes the Eyes model plus platform state and mission context, and applies deterministic doctrine to produce explainable advice.

  • Candidate generation
  • 13 constraint gates
  • Weighted scoring & doctrine tiers
  • Correction ledger & per-cycle audit trace
03 · Execution scaffold
BODY

Body is the downstream scaffold that carries bounded guidance to the host over the interoperability boundary. It does not bind to real actuators.

  • SAE AS-4 JAUS mobility messaging
  • SafetyExecutor simulation path
  • Host accepts / rejects guidance
  • No doctrine re-implementation
Boundary rule
What it guarantees
Eyes are descriptive
Eyes must not recommend movement, apply doctrine, or emit control commands.
Brain advises, not actuates
Brain may publish platform guidance, but never low-level actuation.
Body stays downstream
Body must not re-implement doctrine reasoning.
Sensors stay encapsulated
Sensor SDK types remain inside adapter implementation files, zero leakage into the core.
NATO Architecture Framework

Documented to NAF v4.1.

PERSEUS is described against the NATO Architecture Framework (NAF v4.1, ISO/IEC 42010), the same formal language a defence architecture review uses. These are the published logical, capability and resource viewpoints, the artefacts an evaluator reads to assess structure, scope and traceability.

Viewpoint L2 · Logical Specifications · Nodes & Needlines Open full view
PERSEUS NAF L2 logical structure: Eyes, Brain and Body nodes with eight needlines across the adapter boundary

The logical nodes (Eyes, Brain, Body) inside the system-of-interest boundary, the external nodes (operator/C2, cooperative mesh peer, host UGV platform), and the eight needlines that carry information products, with advisory outputs distinguished from inputs.

Viewpoint C1 · Concepts · Capability Taxonomy Open full view
PERSEUS NAF C1 capability taxonomy: tactical-autonomy reasoning decomposed into terrain interpretation, decision, cooperative sensing, guidance publication, COP contribution, mission coordination and audit

The capabilities PERSEUS provides a host UGV, independent of implementation, decomposed from the root tactical-autonomy reasoning capability down to GNSS-denied navigation resilience and contested-autonomy operation, with their effectiveness criteria.

Viewpoint P2 · Physical Resources · Structure Open full view
PERSEUS NAF P2 resource structure: Eyes, Brain, Body, Interop and Operator resource groups realizing the logical nodes

The physical resources that realize the logical nodes, runtime modules grouped under Eyes, Brain, Body, Interop and the operator surface, with vendor sensor SDKs confined to adapters behind a CI-gated, sensor-agnostic boundary.

Inside the Brain

How a single decision is made.

Every advisory is the product of the same deterministic pipeline, which is exactly why it can be replayed, audited, and explained to a reviewer line by line.

Step 01

Generate

Brain proposes a set of candidate tactical actions from the current Eyes model, platform state and mission context.

Step 02

Gate

Each candidate passes through 13 constraint gates. Anything that violates a hard constraint is filtered out before scoring.

Step 03

Score

Surviving candidates are scored by weighted criteria and ranked within doctrine tiers, the structure encodes the tactical intent.

Step 04

Explain & record

The chosen advisory is emitted with its rationale, a correction-ledger entry, and a hash-anchored audit trace for replay.

Platform-agnostic by design

No proprietary kit required.

The development sensor rig, stereo cameras, LiDAR, radar, a Jetson-class compute node, exists only to validate Eyes, timing and evidence generation. It is not a product dependency.

  • In deployment, host adapters emit the same sensor-neutral v1 input contracts from the platform’s own feeds.
  • Zero sensor / camera / LiDAR / radar / GNSS identifiers in the Brain, doctrine or perception-products layer, audited at every commit, 0 hits.
  • Runs on an appropriate Linux compute node aboard the host platform.

“PERSEUS does not require Praesidium-owned cameras, LiDAR, radar, or any specific compute box. Those assets are development and validation equipment only, not a product dependency.”

, System positioning, PERSEUS technical brief

See the capabilities in detail.

Explore how PERSEUS maps to NATO DIANA multidomain-autonomy requirements, or dive into the standards and evidence behind it.